Legal Opinion
Stoltz, Wagner & Brown v. Cimarron Exploration Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 10, 1981No. CIV-76-763-D, CIV-77-86-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
These cases are actions by Plaintiffs Stoltz, Wagner & Brown, a Partnership, and Coseka Resources (U.S.A.) Limited against Defendants Cimarron Exploration Company and G. Weaver Jordan, for damages sustained by Plaintiffs as a result of Defendants’ alleged breach of two separate Exploration Agreements. It is asserted and the Court finds that subject matter jurisdiction is present by reason of diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. As these cases concern generally the same transactions and the same parties…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Security Insurance Company Of New Haven v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Sautbine v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Misco Leasing, Inc., Formerly Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. L. L. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Continental Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Polymer Fabricating, Inc. v. Employers Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Raydon Exploration, Inc. v. LaddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Oklahoma Employers Safety Group v. Colbert Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Raydon Exploration, Inc. v. LaddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Two Sisters LLC v. RussellDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020