Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance v. Bank of Dawson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1934No. 30,059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

In this action to have its demand declared a preferred claim against an insolvent bank, plaintiff (Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance Company) procured a favorable decision after trial to the court. Defendants (Bank of Dawson and J. N. Peyton, as commissioner of banks) appeal from the order denying their motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The defendant Bank of Dawson is in liquidation, having been taken over for that purpose by the commissioner of banks May 13. 1931. For a long time prior thereto the bank had been doing a general insurance business under the name of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Milne v. Capital Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Hjelle v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Campion v. Village of GracevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Ottawa Banking & Trust Co. v. Crookston State Bank Ex Rel. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. The American National Bank of Saint Paul v. National Indemnity Company of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  3. State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API