Legal Opinion

Campion v. Village of Graceville

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1930No. 28,116PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Both defendant banks became insolvent December 14, 1926, and are in course of liquidation by defendant Yeigel as commissioner of banks. Shortly before their insolvency there was an attempted consolidation, which for reasons not now important seems not to have been consummated. Plaintiff sues as treasurer of the village of Graceville to recover, as a special deposit, the moneys hereinafter referred to. She first demanded of the village council that the action be commenced on behalf of the village. That demand was not complied with, and the village ivas made a defendant. After a decision and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Allen v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Robinson v. Bank of DarienSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. State ex rel. Donnelly v. HobeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Gray v. ElliottWyoming Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  3. Ottawa Banking & Trust Co. v. Crookston State Bank Ex Rel. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BruckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Marmarth School District No. 12 v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API