Legal Opinion
Milne v. Capital Trust & Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1927No. 25,813PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this action to recover as on a preferred claim certain money from an insolvent bank, there was a trial without a jury. After decision for plaintiff defendants appeal from the judgment. April 8, 1924, one Kiehl paid to Capital Trust & Savings Bank of St. Paul $1,227.38, being the amount, principal and interest, • which he then owed on a mortgage loan held by plaintiff, then and now a resident of St. Paul. The payment was accompanied by a satisfaction ready for the signature of plaintiff as assignee of the mortgage. The bank commingled the money with its general funds but immediately sent a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Drinkall v. Movius State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Bishop v. MahoneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Blummer v. Scandinavian American State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Stein v. KempSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Blythe v. KujawaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Standard Oil Co. (Ind.) v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Winkler v. VeigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Berg v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Tobiason v. First State Bank of AshbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.