Legal Opinion

State of Oregon v. Cahill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

208 Or. 538 (1956)

293 P.2d 169

298 P.2d 214

STATE OF OREGON

v.

CAHILL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued September 15, 1955.

Affirmed January 25, 1956.

Affirmed on rehearing June 13, 1956.

Certiorari denied November 5, 1956.

Harry G. Hoy, Oceanlake, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was B. Richard Anderson, Newport.

William T. Hollen, Special Deputy District Attorney, Newport, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General for Oregon, Walter W. Foster, District Attorney, Dallas, and T.R. Adams, Special Deputy District Attorney, Taft.

Befor…

Also in this document: Dissent · Rossman; Dissent · Tooze; Per curiam.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API