Legal Opinion

Croft v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

This is, in effect, an appeal from an order of the district court for Nobles county, for judgment against a- garnishee. Gen. St. 1878, e. 66, § 197, enacts that any party to a garnishment proceeding, deeming himself aggrieved by any order or final judgment therein, may remove the same from a district court-to the supreme court, by appeal, in the same cases, in like manner, and with like effect as in a civil action.

That no appeal lies from an order for judgment in a civil action has been settled by several decisions of this court. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 513; Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 514;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langdon v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Searles v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  3. Lamb v. McCannaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  4. Ryan v. KranzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  5. Rogers v. HolyokeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. St. Anthony Falls Bank v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Duxbury v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  3. Alfred v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Krafve v. RoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. McClearn v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API