Lamb v. McCanna
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Olmsted county, and presents only a question of practice, which is stated in the syllabus and opinion of the court!
1Opinion of the Court
By- the Court
GileillaN, Oh. J.
In the court below all the defendants except McCanna made default; he answered and plaintiff replied. The cause came on for trial and after plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested, McCanna moved on the pleadings that the action be dismissed as to him. The court sustained the motion, and plaintiff excepted. The ruling of the court was reduced to the form of an order of dismissal and entered, and from this order plaintiff appeals. The objection is made here that the order is not appealable. An appeal does not lie from the rulings or decisions of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Von Glahn v. SommerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Croft v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Hodgins v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Searles v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Ryan v. KranzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.