Ryan v. Kranz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
This case was tried by the district court without a jury. As conclusions of law, the court finds “that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, and that the defendant is entitled to judgment against the plaintiff for his costs and disbursements, ” adding the words: “Let judgment be entered accordingly.” This direction is a part of the “decision” of the court, within the evident meaning of Gen. St. c. 66, § 226.. It is not an order involving the merits, or any part thereof,, within the meaning of Gen. St. c. 86, § 8, subd. 3, relating-to appeals in civil actions. It is merely a direction that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Winona v. HuffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Searles v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Lamb v. McCannaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
3Cited by4 opinions
- Child v. MorganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Croft v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Nikannis Co. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Bussell v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905