Legal Opinion
Akers v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 9, 1982No. Civ. H-81-419PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Dr. Geoffrey R. Akers and Eileen G. Akers instituted this suit against the United States and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for damages and an injunction because of alleged improper conduct of an agent of the Internal Revenue Service. The defendants have moved to dismiss, asserting that this court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit nor the defendants and that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), (2), (6).
The pro se complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Snyder v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
- Cameron v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
- Young v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1984
- White v. CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Childress v. Northrop Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.