Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 18, 1984No. Civ. F 84-211PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEE, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Costs filed August 28, 1984. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion will be granted in its entirety.

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. Pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972). This court also recognizes that federal courts have historically exercised great tolerance to insure that an impartial forum remains available to plaintiffs invoking the jurisdiction of the court without the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Lonsdale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Bruce Smith, United States of America v. Roberta BlairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Olga's Kitchen of Hayward, Inc. v. PapoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API