White v. Commissioner
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review this recommendation is hereby adopted. The motion to dismiss is hereby allowed, for the reasons set forth in Judge Neiman’s report. The error, if any, objected to by plaintiff does not affect the report’s substance. The clerk is ordered to enter judgment for the defendant. So Ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff George M. White, acting pro se, filed suit asserting a variety of claims against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Plaintiff claims, inter…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Demes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Buaiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Mercado Arocho v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.