In re Estate of Crozier
California Supreme Court
Application for writ of review. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
On the 26th of November, 1881, an instrument, purporting to be the last will and. testament of James Crozier, deceased, was admitted to probate, and letters testamentary issued to Daggett, named in said instrument as executor, without bond. May 29, 1883, on the petition of Jane Crozier, mother of deceased, a judgment or order was made and entered annulling and revoking the probate of the alleged will.
Daggett (the alleged executor), served and filed notice of an appeal from the judgment or order revoking the probate, and filed the three hundred dollar bond, on the 14th of June, 1883.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Wood v. DwightNew York Court of Chancery · 1823
3Cited by13 opinions
- Moore v. McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bulmash v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bateman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Plutus Min. Co. v. Orme, County Com'rs.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.