Moore v. McKevitt
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Marcel E. Cerf, C. H. Sooy, A. B. Weiler and Netherton, Johnston & Snyder for Appellant. Charles M. Cassin, James L. Atteridge, J. Early Craig, Rea, Cassin & Caldwell and John H. Leonard for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This appeal is taken from a judgment pronounced after verdict of a jury declaring that Thomas W. Moore was not of sound and disposing.mind on November 21, 1908, at the time of executing a purported will.
Mr. Moore died on May 12, 1914. A purported will dated Jánuary 13, 1896, was admitted to probate on June 19, 1914. In accordance with the terms of this writing respondents, Charles Moore, William A. Moore, and Stella Moore Tolle, nephews and niece of the deceased, were appointed respectively administrators and administratrix of the estate.
In October, 1916, a purported will bearing date of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gale v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Gaines v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re Elliott's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- New Albertsons, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.