Legal Opinion

More v. More

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1900No. S.F. No. 1104PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco setting aside a judgment against a removed administrator. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The plaintiff, H. Clifford More, as administrator of the estate of Lawrence W. More, deceased, brought this action against John F. More, administrator of the estate of Alexander P. More, deceased, to establish his claim of thirteen thousand six hundred and seventy dollars and fourteen cents against the estate of said Alexander P. More, deceased, under section 1498 of the. Code of Civil Procedure. On January 15, 1897, judgment was entered for plaintiff for the full amount of his claim. Afterward John F. More, and Eliza M. Miller, who had been appointed special administratrix of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bank of Troy v. StantonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Taylor v. SavageSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. In re Estate of CrozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. In re the Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Plutus Min. Co. v. Orme, County Com'rs.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Vickerson v. WehrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API