Legal Opinion

Bulmash v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1979No. L.A. 31081PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

— We examine the status of a judgment lien pursuant to a judgment that was subsequently vacated. A lien is accessory to the obligation on which it is based; therefore, it would ordinarily be automatically invalid once the judgment was vacated. In the case at bar, however, the vacating order was appealed and reversed; accordingly, the judgment was restored as originally entered, with effect as of the date of entry.

The issue before us is whether a lien pursuant to judgment relates back to the original date of recording after reversal of the order vacating that judgment. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Strudthoff v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sherwin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Wolkowitz v. Beverly (In Re Beverly)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Lynch v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Annod Corp. v. Hamilton & SamuelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API