Bulmash v. Davis
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
— We examine the status of a judgment lien pursuant to a judgment that was subsequently vacated. A lien is accessory to the obligation on which it is based; therefore, it would ordinarily be automatically invalid once the judgment was vacated. In the case at bar, however, the vacating order was appealed and reversed; accordingly, the judgment was restored as originally entered, with effect as of the date of entry.
The issue before us is whether a lien pursuant to judgment relates back to the original date of recording after reversal of the order vacating that judgment. We…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Strudthoff v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Sherwin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Wolkowitz v. Beverly (In Re Beverly)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Sparks Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Lynch v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Annod Corp. v. Hamilton & SamuelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.