Legal Opinion

Trussell v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1935No. 10945PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. A witness for the State was permitted to testify: “I asked him [the defendant] to come up there and stay . . at the house and help me; and I told him, ‘If you will help me sell some whisky, if I have any money I will pay you.5 ” The defendant objected to this evidence on the ground that it put his character in issue, and was immaterial and prejudicial. In his statement the defendant told the jury that he was employed by the witness “for the purpose of selling whisky there at her house” at the time in question. In the circumstances, the admission of the evidence was not cause…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Moore v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Swain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Hannah v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Hardwick v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Wyatt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Daniel v. EtheredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API