Pulliam v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
The evidence is entirely circumstantial, and must be measured by the rules of law with reference to circumstantial evidence. The Code, § 38-109, declares: “To warrant a conviction on circumstantial evidence, the proved facts shall not only be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but shall exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.” In all homicide eases it must be shown that death was caused by some criminal agency on the part of some other human being. Langston v. State, 151 Ga. 388 (106 S. E. 903). It. appears that Mrs. Winnie Pulliam…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Moore v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Wrisper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Potts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Loomis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Sides v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Flanigan v. RevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.