Wyatt v. State

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The general grounds of the motion for new trial are not argued in the brief for the plaintiff in error or otherwise insisted upon, but, after carefully examining the record, we find and hold that the verdict is amply supported by evidence.

The first ground of the amended motion for new trial alleges that the court erred in allowing the defendant’s witness, Dr. Lipton, to testify on cross-examination what the accused had said to him about another homicide, for which he had previously been convicted of murder and for which he had served a…