Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 5, 2010No. CV050384; A134858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant Country Mutual Insurance Company appeals a judgment for plaintiff after a jury verdict in this action for breach of an oral insurance binder, raising eight assignments of error. Plaintiff cross-appeals, contending that the trial court erred in disallowing expert witness costs. Because they are dispositive, we write only to address defendant’s fifth and sixth assignments of error, in which defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict and in submitting plaintiffs claims to the jury. We agree that the trial court erred and reverse on those…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. United Pacific Insurance Co. v. Truck Ins. Exch.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Dynagraphics, Inc. v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stuart v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Big River Construction, Inc. v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Country Mutual Insurance v. PittmanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API