Legal Opinion

Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. Society

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1898PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From Multnomah : Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Action by the Cleveland Oil & Paint Manufacturing Company against the Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society to recover on an oral contract of insurance, and defendant appeals from a judgment against it.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an action to recover a fire- loss on an alleged oral contract of insurance. The substance of the complaint is that on May 24, 1895, plaintiff was the owner of a stock of paints, oils, varnishes, etc., located in a frame building erected on leased land in Portland, Oregon, and, being desirous of securing indemnity against loss by fire, promised defendant that if it would insure said property for one year from that day, at 12 o’clock noon, plaintiff would pay upon demand the usual and customary rate therefor; that defendant accepted the offer, and insured the property upon the terms…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hubbard & Spencer v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Trustees of the First Baptist Church v. Brooklyn Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. De Grove v. . Metropolitan Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Commercial Fire Insurance v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Fuller v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mount v. WelshOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Employers Fire Insurance v. SpeedMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hamacher v. TUMYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Elam v. SoaresOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Cunningham v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API