Legal Opinion

Country Mutual Insurance v. Pittman

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 16, 2012No. 03:11-CV-00806-HUPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the plaintiffs motion (Dkt. # 18) is denied, and the defendant’s motion (Dkt. # 21) is granted in part and denied in part.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS

Summary judgment should be granted “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(2). In considering a motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API