Country Mutual Insurance v. Pittman
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the plaintiffs motion (Dkt. # 18) is denied, and the defendant’s motion (Dkt. # 21) is granted in part and denied in part.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARDS
Summary judgment should be granted “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(2). In considering a motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.