Legal Opinion

RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 15, 2012No. 27157PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

Appellant RFT Management Co., L.L.C. (RFT) brought this action against respondents Tinsley & Adams, L.L.P. and attorney Welborn D. Adams (collectively, Law Firm) based on their legal representation of RFT during the closing of its purchase of two real estate investment properties in Greenwood County. RFT alleged claims for (1) professional negligence (legal malpractice), (2) breach of fiduciary duty, (3) violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act1 (UTPA), and (4) aiding and abetting a securities violation in contravention of the South Carolina Uniform Securities Act of 2005…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Newsome v. GallacherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Maybank v. BB&T Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. Town of Hollywood v. FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Kunst v. LoreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  5. Fabian v. LindsaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API