Legal Opinion
Town of Hollywood v. Floyd
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 15, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2010-174946; Nos. 27252PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
The Town of Hollywood (the Town) filed this action against William Floyd, Troy Readen, and Edward McCracken (collectively, the developers) seeking a declaration that the developers may not subdivide their property without approval from the Town’s Planning Commission and an injunction prohibiting subdivision of the property until such approval is obtained. The developers filed counterclaims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), alleging equal protection and due process violations as well as various state law claims. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the Town on its claims for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- A HELPING HAND, LLC v. Baltimore County, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Grant v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jacquelin S. Bennett v. T. Heyward Carter, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- McMaster v. DewittCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Spur at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. LallaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Stoneledge at Lake Keowee Owners' Ass'n v. Builders FirstSource-Southeast GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- Stoneledge at Lake Keowee Owners' Ass'n v. Clear View Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.