Legal Opinion
Newsome v. Gallacher
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2013No. 12-5068PublishedCited by 230 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to answer a classic personal jurisdiction question — who was injured, and where? The answer to that question will determine whether the representative of a Canadian-owned Delaware corporation operating exclusively in Oklahoma may sue the corporation’s Canadian officers and directors in Oklahoma.
To bring a suit, the plaintiff must show the defendants are subject to personal ju risdiction in Oklahoma. The Constitution allows for personal jurisdiction only when the requirements of due process are met. Here we conclude the Constitution allows this…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Niemi v. LasshoferCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Dental Dynamics v. Jolly Dental GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Compania De Inversiones v. Grupo Cementos de ChihuahuaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Klein v. CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Eighteen Seventy v. JaysonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.