Legal Opinion

Noyes v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This is a complaint in trover, for the conversion of certain personal property described in a lien note dated December 18, 1920, payable four months from date. The defendant answered by general denial. The case was tried by the court; judgment for the defendant. The case comes here on exceptions by plaintiffs to the admission of evidence, finding of facts and to the judgment thereon.

The lien note, called the Pierce note, and signed by defendant, was overdue, and unpaid, and unquestionably valid. The property conditionally sold, to the defendant covered by it was to be and remain plaintiffs’,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Brunswick & Western Railway Co. v. ClemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Rogers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1917

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of DelliganSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
  3. Wright v. GodinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  4. Hinkle v. Basic Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Dow v. A. C. Cheney Piano Action Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API