Legal Opinion

Brunswick & Western Railway Co. v. Clem

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 28, 1888PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Pleadings. Accord and satisfaction. Covenant not to sue. Estoppel. Witness.. Perjury. Charge of court. Evidence. Verdict. Before Judge Atkinson. Ware superior court. April term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

This was an action for a personal injury. Clem was in the employment of the railroad company as a train-hand; and in March, 1886, his arm was crushed in the act of coupling cars, or more accurately, in the act of coupling a car to the engine. The record shows that in all probability, the casualty was produced by the defective spring of one of the bumpers. In consequence of that'defect, the machinery closed so as to clasp the arm and crush it. *536Clem broughthis action in August, 1886, and upon the trial a verdict was rendered in his favor for $1,467. The railroad company…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Juchter v. Boehm, Bendheim & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1879

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Petty v. Brunswick & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. King v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Long v. ScanlanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. RylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API