Legal Opinion

Howard National Bank v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1923PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an action of contract on a promissory note signed by the defendant Graham Wilson and payable to the orden of the plaintiff. The answer was a general denial. The trial was by jury, and, at the close of the evidence, a verdict was directed for the plaintiff. The case is here on the defendant’s exceptions to the direction of a verdict and to the judgment *443thereon. Other exceptions saved at the trial are not briefed and so are waived.

The note in suit was executed and delivered to the plaintiff September 19, 1919, and was payable on demand with interest. Interest was indorsed thereon to…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . Pam.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Liberty Trust Co. v. TiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  4. Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Fehr v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API