Rogers v. Whitney
Supreme Court of Vermont
Replevin for two horses. Plea the general issue. Trial by court at the June Term, 1916, Windsor County, Slack, J., presiding. Judgment, on the facts found, for the defendant to recover his costs with an order that on failure of the plaintiff to pay to the defendant the sum of $32.80 and the costs, the plaintiff should return the horse to the defendant. The plaintiff excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The Johnson & Fifield Company, the defendant in interest, was a dealer in horses at West Lebanon, N. H. It sold two horses to one Barney Levett, who was also a dealer in horses and resided at Hartford, Yt. These sales were made at different times, and on each occasion the Company took from Levett a lien note providing that the horse sold and described should remain the property of the Company until the note was paid. These lien notes were seasonably recorded in the office of the town clerk of Hartford. At the time of these transactions the Company knew that Levett was a horse dealer, that he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Armington v. HoustonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
- Barber v. VintonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- Zwietusch v. LuehringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Hunt v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Manley Brothers Co., Inc. v. SomersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Medomak Canning Co. v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
- Noyes v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Voelker v. JosephWashington Supreme Court · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.