State v. Erickson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
We are asked to construe N.D.C.C. § 53-06.1-16.1, dealing with the use of a fraudulent scheme or technique to cheat or skim involving the game of twenty-one (sometimes referred to as “blackjack”). We hold the statute applies to the actions of a twenty-one dealer and affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
Trent Erickson was a twenty-one dealer employed by Red River Human Services at a lounge in Fargo. After noticing the average net proceeds from twenty-one were not what other clubs in the state were making, Red River Human Services employed a private investigator to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. TweedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KraftNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TrosenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Marcil Group Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. HuberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HolecekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Wong v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.