Legal Opinion
State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1994No. Civ. No. 930352PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
The State of North Dakota appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its forfeiture action against a 1989 Black Cadillac. Five and a half months after it seized the Cadillac without a warrant, the State began the forfeiture action under North Dakota’s Uniform Controlled Substances Act. The trial court dismissed the forfeiture action because it had not been “instituted promptly” as required by statute. We affirm.
*460I
The State’s complaint alleges that in February 1992 undercover law enforcement agents bought marijuana at Herb’s Lounge, Wilton, North Dakota. In two instances, the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. GlaesmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Wahl v. Morton County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ZimmermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- W.J.M. v. J.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.