Legal Opinion

State v. Huber

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1996No. Criminal 960099PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

A jury convicted Benjamin Huber of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), a class B misdemeanor. On appeal, Huber claims the district court erred in allowing the State to amend the jury instructions to include “actual physical control” (APC). We reverse and remand for a new trial because the instructions permitted the jury to convict of DUI even if it found the defendant had only committed the lesser included offense of APC.

I

On the evening of August 4, 1995, a Mercer County Deputy Sheriff responded to a dispatcher call reporting a “suspicious” vehicle on County Road…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. EldredNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rittenour v. GibsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Fargo v. NovotnyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BrossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API