Legal Opinion

State v. Kraft

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1987No. Crim. 1213PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Garold B. Kraft (Kraft) appeals from a jury verdict convicting him of theft of property, a class C felony, pursuant to §§ 12.1-23-02(1) and 12.1-23-05(2), N.D.C.C. We vacate the jury verdict and remand for a new trial.

In 1984, Garold Kraft was in the construction business and operated a company doing business as Kraft Construction in Bismarck, North Dakota. As a part of his business, Kraft would contract with customers for the sale and construction of metal buildings. These buildings were sold at specified dimensions with a specific amount of component parts which corre…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. State v. KringstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ThielNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Kreiner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HerschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. FreyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. WoehlhoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API