In re the Claim of Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 28, 1999, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, a claims adjuster for the employer, was terminated for leaving work early without authorization in violation of the employer’s attendance policy. In our view, substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits due to her misconduct (see, Matter of Sadowski…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of ConfortiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of SadowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of EstevezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re TordsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of UntermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of SurvillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.