Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Survilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 18, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a full-time housekeeper for the employer after approximately three months. In our view, substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of SadowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of ArmbrusterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of PierroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MaxwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of CoronelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API