In re the Claim of Conforti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 21, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was discharged from his employment when, after having received warnings regarding his absences, he failed to contact his employer until 4:30 p.m. on October 12, 1998, 8V2 hours after his shift started. In our view, substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of FaheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of AlmanzarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re TordsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of MahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.