Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Greenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 13, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he was suspended from his employment due to misconduct.
Claimant was suspended from his employment as a butcher for a supermarket after his supervisor observed him wearing street clothes and paying for his groceries prior to the end of his shift in violation of the company policies prohibiting employees from leaving early and shopping on company time. Claimant had previously been warned that leaving…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of PatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of SandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of ClumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of GortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of ChilliousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of KryszakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.