Legal Opinion
Global NAPs California, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2010No. 09-55600PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide, among other issues, whether the California Public Utilities Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it interpreted an interconnection agreement between two competitive local telephone exchange carriers as establishing the rate at which each must compensate the other for handling Voice-over-Internet-Protoeol calls.
I
A
“Prior to 1996, local telephone service generally was provided by a local monopolist who offered services at prices regulated and imposed by a variety of governmental agencies.” Pac. Bell Tel. Co. v. Cal. Pub. Utils.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- SBC Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Pacific Bell v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co., Inc. v. Sprintcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- At & T Corp. v. Core Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- At & T Communications of CaliFornia, Inc. v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Big River Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- P.R. Telephone Co. v. Telecomm. Regulatory BoardDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.