SBC Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Appellant SBC Communications contends that in denying its application to provide long-distance telephone service in the State of Oklahoma, the Federal Communications Commission has erroneously interpreted the provisions governing Bell operating company entry into the long-distance market in their home region states (to be codified at 47 U.S.C. § 271(c)(1)(A), (B)). We affirm.
I
SBC Communications provides local telephone exchange (intraLATA) 1 service in the States of Arkansas, California, Kansas, Missouri, Nevada,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- At&T Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- SBC Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Grand Canyon Air Tour Coalition v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Amer Fed Labor v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.