At & T Communications of CaliFornia, Inc. v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
When a customer of telephone company A places a local call to a customer of telephone company B, the two companies cooperate to complete the call. Traditionally, the telephone company of the individual receiving the call (company B) would bill the originating phone company (company A) for completing, or “terminating,” the call, on a per-minute basis. When the phone call went in the opposite direction— from a company B customer to a company A customer — the billing, too, would be reversed. Underlying this “reciprocal compensation” arrangement was the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ja'vonce Warre, on Behalf of E.T. Iv, a Minor Child v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co., Inc. v. Sprintcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. PolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- At & T Corp. v. Core Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Guam Housing Corp. v. CSC (Potter)Superior Court of Guam · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.