St. Clair Borough v. Tamaqua & Pottsville Elec. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 292, Jan. T., 1917, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1917, No. 2, in Equity, dismissing bill in equity for injunction in case of The Borough of Saint Clair v. The Tamaqua and Pottsville Electric Railway Company, the Pottsville and Saint Clair Electric Railway Company, the Pottsville Union Traction Company, and the Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Company.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 292, Jan. T., 1917, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1917, No. 2, in Equity, dismissing bill in equity for injunction in case of The Borough of Saint Clair v. The Tamaqua and Pottsville Electric Railway Company, the Pottsville and Saint Clair Electric Railway Company, the Pottsville Union Traction Company, and the Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Company. Bill in equity to restrain defendant from running cars over a certain designated route or to prohibit defendant from charging more than a five-cent fare thereon. Before Beciitel, P. J. The facts appear by…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Moschziskee,
The Borough of St. Clair filed a bill in equity against the Tamaqua and Pottsville Electric Railway Company, the Pottsville and St. Clair Electric Railway Company, the Pottsville Union Traction Company, and the Eastern Pennsylvania Railways Company, praying that they either be restrained from running their cars over a certain designated route or prohibited from charging more than a five-cent fare thereon; September 18, 1917; the . court below preliminarily enjoined the operation of the *465cars; but, on September 25, 1917, the following decree was entered, “The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- York Water Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Bellevue Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- New Brighton Borough v. New Brighton Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Bethlehem City Water Co. v. Bethlehem BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.