Legal Opinion

New Brighton Borough v. New Brighton Water Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1915No. Appeal, No. 97PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal, No. 97, Oct. T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of O. P. Beaver Co., June T., 1913, No. 188, awarding mandamus in case of The Borough of New Brighton v. New Brighton Water Company and Beaver Valley Water Company, lessee and grantee. Petition for mandamus. Before Holt, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 97, Oct. T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of O. P. Beaver Co., June T., 1913, No. 188, awarding mandamus in case of The Borough of New Brighton v. New Brighton Water Company and Beaver Valley Water Company, lessee and grantee. Petition for mandamus. Before Holt, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court awarded a peremptory mandamus, commanding the defendant to furnish the plaintiff with a statement of the net cost of constructing and maintaining the plant of the New Brighton Water Company, and the dividends theretofore declared by said company or…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mosoi-iziskee,

This is an appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus against the two defendant corporations, commanding them “to furnish to The Borough of New Brighton, the plaintiff, a statement of the net cost of constructing and maintaining the plant of the New Brighton Water Company and the dividends heretofore declared by said New Brighton Water Company or its lessee and grantee, and to open the books, papers, and vouchers of said defendants so that the said plaintiff can check and verify said statement.”

The New Brighton Water Company was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamsport v. Citizens' Water & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Reynoldsville Boro. v. Reynoldsville Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. McClintock v. Young RepublicansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Greensburg Borough v. Westmoreland Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Monessen Borough v. Monessen Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. St. Clair Borough v. Tamaqua & Pottsville Elec. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API