First National Bank v. Klimenhagen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Action by plaintiff to recover on a promissory note and to enforce by judicial sale its rights to collateral thereto. The answer alleges that the note was procured by fraud.
The facts are substantially these: On November 15, 1920, defendant was solicited, by one Earl Gernert, to buy stock in the Austin Clay Works, and on that day he gave his note to Gernert for $1,250 payable “to the order of myself” 6 months after date. He indorsed the note. This note together with á liberty bond for $100 was given for 12J shares of stock in the Austin Clay Works. The certificate of this stock was then…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Bank of Morton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Goedhard v. FolstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- First National Bank v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Midland National Bank v. Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by4 opinions
- Olsen v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Harwood State Bank v. Hendrum Co-Operative Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Thomes v. AtkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1943