Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Hoffmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1928No. 26,779PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff sues to recover on four $500 promissory notes. One England was a banker at Lamberton. 0.n March 5, 1920, he sold a 160-acre farm to defendant under a contract for deed which contained a provision that if after two years from the date thereof defendant did not want the land England would take it back and pay back the money which defendant had paid. England took, with the contract that he got from defendant, notes including the ones here involved for deferred payments. Two years later defendant exercised his privilege…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McPherrin v. TittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Hawkins v. SaubySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. State Bank of Morton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Hunter v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Shaffer v. Brooklyn Park Garden ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Caballero v. Litchfield Wood-Working Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API