Legal Opinion
Goedhard v. Folstad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 12, 1923No. 23,530PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
On April 12, 1920, the defendants, residents of Ruthton in Pipe-stone county, Minnesota, entered into a contract with the San Benito Land Company of Kansas City, Missouri, for the purchase of a tract of land in the state of Texas, and as a part of the transaction executed to the land company two promissory notes, one for the sum of $2,500 payable July 12, 1921, and the other for the sum of $3,000 payable October 12, 1921. The land company indorsed these notes without recourse to G. F. Hutchinson, its agent who had negotiated the sale of the land, and Hutchinson indorsed them to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Second National Bank v. DonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Rosemond v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Pennington County Bank v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Campbell v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- First National Bank v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Benson v. County of MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.