Legal Opinion

Harwood State Bank v. Hendrum Co-Operative Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1926No. 25,175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial. At the times herein important one Nelson was the cashier of the Hendrum State Bank and devoted his time to the active management of its business. He was also secretary and treasurer of the Hendrum Co-operative Ele vator Company, the defendant herein, and the president of plaintiff bank, but did not participate in its active management. The two banks served each other at times by taking over notes of customers to avoid excess loans.

This action is to recover upon a $2,500 note purporting to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Bank of Morton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Central Metropolitan Bank v. Chippewa County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. First National Bank v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. KohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. First National Bank v. KlimenhagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olsen v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Case v. FevigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Blumberg v. TaggartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API