State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Taylor
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
Appellants were involved in an automobile accident. The District Court for the Eighteenth Judicial District granted the motion of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) for summary judgment. It held that State Farm insurance policies held by Mr. Taylor and Mr. Hanson did not provide uninsured motor vehicle coverage for this accident. We reverse.
The issues are:
1. Did the State Farm policies provide uninsured motor vehicle coverage under the circumstances of this case?
2. Is State Farm absolved of liability because the insured violated the “no consent to settlement” exclusion of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Finney v. Farmers Insurance Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Dominici v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Bauer Ranch, Inc. v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Hager v. American West InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1989
- Nimmick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Bartell v. American Home Assurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.