Legal Opinion

Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2000No. 00-174PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Appellant, Adam Meyer (Adam) filed a declaratory judgment action in the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, County of Roosevelt, State of Montana, seeking a judgment declaring that he was entitled to underinsured motorists coverage under State Farm Insurance policies issued to his stepmother, Joan Meyer. Adam further moved to amend his complaint to seek uninsured coverage. Upon cross-motions for summary judgment, the District Court found in favor of State Farm Insurance. Adam appeals from that order. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

¶2 We state the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sprunk v. First Bank SystemMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance v. LivengoodMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cecil v. Cardinal Drilling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Van KirkMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HardawayMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BoyerMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Contreras v. FitzgeraldMontana Supreme Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API