Legal Opinion
Bartell v. American Home Assurance Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2002No. 01-575PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 This case is before us on a question certified to this Court by the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Missoula Division. We accepted certification by our order dated August 30,2001. ¶2 The certified question presented, by the federal court is re-stated as:
Whether an automobile policy issued in the State of Montana with respect to a motor vehicle registered and maintained in Montana that states: “ ‘Uninsured motor vehicle’ does not include any vehicle or equipment: ... owned by any governmental unit or agency” is in violation of § 33-23-201, MCA, or the public policy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jacobson v. Implement Dealers Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Francis v. International Service Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Ruckdaschel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
- Guiberson v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Cropper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James R. Smith v. Salish Kootenai College Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jenkins v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
- James R. Smith v. Salish Kootenai College Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Cross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
- Bartell v. American Home Assurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.