Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Ekwall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The question for consideration is whether the affidavit of prejudice law applies to the judge of the department of probate. The 1919 Jurisdictional Act provided that in counties of 100,000 population or more an additional circuit judge should be elected to sit in a department to be designated by the rule of the Circuit Court by an appropriate number and that this department should be known as “department of probate” but that the judge of such a department shall in addition to the duties in the act prescribed also perform the general duties of a Circuit Court judge. Section 3 reads thus:

“That…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Branch v. McCormick's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Northup v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Gantenbein v. WestOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Red v. BoundsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API