Northup v. Hoyt
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: E: D. Shattuck, Judge. Mandamus proceeding by H. H. Northup, a taxpayer of Multnomah County, to compel Ralph W. Hoyt, county treasurer, to publish a notice calling in certain warrants for redemption. The particulars of the dispute are stated in the opinion. Defendant appeals from a peremptory order requiring him to publish the notice demanded.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
By section 2465 of Hill’s Ann. Laws, as amended in 1893 (Laws 1893, p. 59), the treasurer of each county is required to give notice, by publication in some newspaper printed or circulated in his county, that there are funds in his hands to redeem outstanding warrants indorsed, “Not paid for want of funds,” *526whenever he has as much as $1,500 belonging to the county fund. On the eleventh day of June, 1897, the treasurer of Multnomah County had on hand $74,-514.86 to the credit of the general county fund, and $6,776.71 belonging to the road fund of his county, levied and collected under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Mayor & Common CouncilNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- State v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- National Bank v. BarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Whiteaker v. HaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1865
- Doty v. EllsbreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3Cited by19 opinions
- Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Jensen v. WhitlowOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Yamhill County v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Oven v. AusleySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Eugene School District No. 4 v. FiskOregon Supreme Court · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.